xalan 2.5.1 vs. 2.7 performance question 2006-10-28 - By toadie D
Brian
Will do. Although I am having problem getting at the source
Linkin from Xalan main page
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/xml-xalan/java/
leads me to a 404
Regards
Toadie
On 10/27/06, Brian Minchau <minchau@(protected)> wrote:
> Toadie,
> In general 2.7.0 should be faster than 2.5.1 because some performance work
> was done after the 2.5.1 release. Of course it all depends on the
> stylesheet and other factors.
>
> I'm concerned that you see more that 10X degredation for your
> multi-threaded application. We are ramping up for 2.7.1 soon. Can you build
> Xalan from the latest code in subversion and see how that performs for you?
> That is going to be very close to the 2.7.1 release.
>
> If the latest development code has the same problem for you, then you need
> to open a defect in JIRA as soon as possible.
>
> - Brian
>
>
>
>
> "toadie D"
> <toadie643@(protected)
> com> To
> xalan-j-users@(protected)
> 10/27/2006 10:20 cc
> PM
> Subject
> xalan 2.5.1 vs. 2.7 performance
> question
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> We have an XSLT that makes ****extensive**** use of Java Extension Function
>
> During benchmarking, the XSLT performs at the same speed in single
> thread mode running under 2.5.1 or 2.7.0.
>
> In multi threaded mode, when multiple threads run concurrently by
> creating a Transformer object from a previously created Templates(),
> the performance degrades 10X or more in Xalan 2.7.0 compared to 2.5.1
>
> I was wondering if there were extensive changes in the Extension
> Function implementation in 2.7.0 compared to 2.5.1?
>
> Thanks in advance
> Toadie
>
>
>
|
|
